Airmail vs Spark: Comparison and Review – Guide
For several years, airmail dominated all other email clients on the Mac. There weren’t many questions about any other clients. If you didn’t like the Mail. App on the Mac, you probably went to the App Store, paid $ 10 and downloaded Airmail because it sends emails much better. But airmail is no longer undeniably at the top. I have long been a fan of Spark for iPhone and iPad to manage my email and reach zero inboxes daily. A few months ago, Readdle launched a version of Spark for Mac. Like its iOS counterparts, Spark is completely free, even on the Mac. It has been viral on the App Store since its launch. So how does this free app stack up for the reigning $ 10 champion, Airmail 3?
Design and Customization
Airmail and Spark have elaborate designs that respect the aesthetics of the macOS Sierra. They are also highly customizable. While Spark allows you to customize swipe gestures, Smart Inbox, signatures, keyboard shortcuts, folders, snooze times and more, airmail is still first in this category. You can turn airmail into just about anything you want. Hide or show the sidebars or parts of them, adjust the menu bar shortcuts, edit folders and snooze, change the whole look with various themes … the possibilities are incredible. I can’t think of anything I would like to change in airmail that I still can’t do in Preferences. Airmail even integrates with several third-party applications. Link services like Wunderlist, Droplr, Google Drive, Dropbox, Evernote and more to see the relevant tasks in your menus. Linking Droplr automatically uploads your file attachments to the cloud, or linking Wunderlist allows you to quickly save messages to a to-do list. Spark manages to have a clean and sophisticated design. It excellently balances the features you need your own prioritization for a smart inbox, plus tools that enhance that. Airmail is an app for the most demanding. The level of customization is second to none and the features you can enable it from a normal email client to a productivity machine.
Features to face the email overhead
The big problem with email nowadays is that most people receive many emails a day. Email clients must manage emails and reduce clutter, but many still don’t do a good job. Spark was built from the ground up to handle email overload and take users to that magical place known as the zero inboxes, a clean, new inbox. Spark immediately uses its smart inbox to organize emails based on type. The new messages are divided into three categories. Personnel appear at the top of regular users like you and me, notifications for various services are at the bottom, and newsletters are below. Spark categorizes all remaining emails together at the bottom. In addition, Spark has optional smart notifications that only notify you about personal things, leaving the rest to be seen later. With one click, you can archive or mark all emails in a specific category as read. If you don’t want to deal with newsletters today, mark them up and move on. Other valuable tools are to fix and suspend. Pinning an email keeps it up-to-date and stable in your inbox until you decide to get rid of it, even if you’ve already moved it to the file. Snooze removes an email temporarily and brings it back to your inbox as a reminder at the time and date you specify. Spark and Airmail also have swipe gestures to act quickly on an email. They are customizable, but Spark has twice the options per slide. For example, swiping from left to right in Spark gives me the option to archive or delete an email, while airmail only allows me to archive. Both applications also have solid and influential research, with many refinement options. Spark wins because it allows you to type in a natural language. I could search for “emails with a JPG attachment” and instantly receive all emails with a JPG file. Airmail is not that smart. Airmail has a unique productivity feature. It creates dedicated folders in addition to the ones you already have to help with the organization. They are more or less like labels: To Do, Memo and Done. O feature it seems a little redundant to me, however. Folders and labels already exist above them, as does Snooze. Still, Spark is clearly the winner by defeating an overwhelming inbox. That is why it must be done so beautifully and efficiently. I think that’s because Airmail has so many customization options, folders and application integrations everywhere, all of which adds to the clutter. Ugly.
Composing Emails
There is not much to talk about the experience of writing emails in Spark or Airmail. Composition windows can vary widely. Airmail has two professional features I like: reminders and sending later. You can include a reminder in a draft to send or finalize it at a particular time. Better yet, end all emails and choose a future date and time to have it sent automatically if you wish. I do not imagine these are features most people use regularly, but it’s good to have them on hand. Airmail also has significant formatting advantages: being able to write your email in Markdown or HTML. HTML, in particular, is helpful if you send out newsletters because you can create a professional graphic letter directly in airmail. Spark is new, so I’m going to take a break, but I hope it comes in time. One advantage of Spark over airmail is quick responses. Think of them as Facebook reactions to emails. Instead of replying to an email just to type a quick phrase, you can use a quick reply to do this for you. The patterns are thank you, smile, great idea, call me, cool, love and agree, but you can also define yours. Quick responses show intelligently up as a response option for personal human senders, not automated newsletters. You can find the button at the bottom of a supported email.
Final note
I hope you like the guide Airmail vs Spark: Comparison and Review. In case if you have any queries regards this article, you may ask us. Also, please share your love by sharing this article with your friends.
